ANTHY522-21B (NET)
Visual Power: Images, Aesthetics & Politics
30 Points
Staff
Convenor(s)
Bronwyn Isaacs
J.2.02
bronwyn.isaacs@waikato.ac.nz
|
Librarian(s)
You can contact staff by:
- Calling +64 7 838 4466 select option 1, then enter the extension.
-
Extensions starting with 4, 5, 9 or 3 can also be direct dialled:
- For extensions starting with 4: dial +64 7 838 extension.
- For extensions starting with 5: dial +64 7 858 extension.
- For extensions starting with 9: dial +64 7 837 extension.
- For extensions starting with 3: dial +64 7 2620 + the last 3 digits of the extension e.g. 3123 = +64 7 262 0123.
Paper Description
From viral popular images to debates over aesthetics, the visual realm is a crucial component of social life, and hence, to the discipline of anthropology. This paper introduces students to foundational theoretical texts and contemporary debates in social and political theory and visual anthropology. To equip students to analyse visual phenomena in terms of theoretical importance, this course will also give students a foundation in anthropological debates regarding the uniqueness of the visual medium in the communication of emotion, affect and power, intersections between propaganda and popular culture, indigenous peoples ownership of their visual traditions and the relationship between meaning and materiality. This course aims to provide students with the analytical concepts with which to interpret the visual realm in a range of cultural and geographic contexts.
Paper Structure
Learning Outcomes
Students who successfully complete the paper should be able to:
Assessment
There are four main assessment components; Reading Responses, Short Paper or Photo/Video Essay, Class Participation & Final Project.
Reading Responses: Each student may choose which weeks they wish to submit a reading response. Eight reading responses must be submitted in total. These responses are due at 8pm on the Wednesday evening of that same week that those readings are discussed in class.
Assessment Components
The internal assessment/exam ratio (as stated in the University Calendar) is 100:0. There is no final exam.
Required and Recommended Readings
Required Readings
Week One: Introduction
It is recommended that you read Spyer & Steadly (2013) or Rose (2001) but these are not required until week two.
Week Two: Theories of Visual Power: One.
Gillian Rose, “Researching Visual Materials: toward a critical visual methodology” Visual Methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials, California: Sage, 2001, 5-32.
Spyer, P & Steadly, M. “Introduction” in Images that Move, Sante Fe: SarPress, 2013, 3-39.
Mitchell, William J. Thomas. "What Do Pictures" Really" Want?." October 77 (1996): 71-82.
Taylor, Lucien. "Iconophobia." Transition 69 (1996): 64-88.
Week Three: Theories of Visual Power: Two
Adorno, M and Horkeimer, T “The culture industry” in Dialectic of Enlightenment, published in “Media and Culture Studies”, Douglas M. Kellner, Meenakshi Gigi Durham (eds), NJ, Wiley:1944 [2006]: 41- 72.
Benjamin, W.“The Work of Art in the Age of its Technological Reproducibility”, in The work of art in the age of its technological reproducibitily and other writings on media Jennings, Doherty & Levin (eds), The Belknap Press of Harvard Univeristy Press: Cambridge, MA.(2008 [1935]): 19-41.
Jodi Dean “Celebrity’s Drive” in Dean, Jodi. Publicity's secret: How technoculture capitalizes on democracy. Cornell: Cornell University Press (2002):114-150
Barthes, R. Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. Translated by Richard Howard. London: Vintage, (1981):23-60
Week Four: Materiality of the Visual
Larkin, Brian. “Degraded Images” in Signal and noise: Infrastructure and Urban Culture in Nigeria. Durham: Duke University Press, (2008): 289-314.
Flood, Finbarr Barry. "Between cult and culture: Bamiyan, Islamic iconoclasm, and the museum." The Art Bulletin 84, no. 4 (2002): 641-659.
Bruno, Giuliana. Surface: Matters of aesthetics, materiality, and media. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014 [Excerpts]
Klima, Alan. “The Charnel Ground” in The funeral casino. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009: 184-230.
Week Five: Race and its Depictions
Roth, L. “Looking at Shirley, the Ultimate Norm: Colour Balance, Image Technologies, and Cognitive Equity”. Canadian Journal of Communication, 34 no 1 (2009): 111-136.
Poole, D. “Equivalent Images” in Vision, Race & its Modernity, p. 107-141
Croft, B. “Laying Ghosts to Rest” in Hight, Eleanor M., and Gary D. Sampson, eds. Colonialist photography: imag (in) ing race and place. Vol. 9. London: Routledge, (2013): 20-29.
Fleetwood, N. 2020. “Captured by the frame: photographic studies of prisoners“ in Marking Time: Art in the Age of Mass Incarceration, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press: 87-117
Week Six: Advertising & Nationalism
Dávila, Arlene. “Images: Producing Culture for the Market” in Latino Spin: Public Image and the Whitewashing of Race. New York: NYU Press (2008): 91-119; 29 pages
Fattal, A. “Operation Christmas” in Guerrilla Marketing: Counterinsurgency and Capitalism in Colombia: Chicago: University of Chicago Press (2018): 80-110
Mazarrella, W.“Citizens Have Sex, Consumers Make Love: KamaSutra I” in Shovelling Smoke: Advertising & Globalization in Contemporary India. Durham: Duke University Press (2003): 59-98
Kemper, S.1993. “The nation consumed: buying and believing in Sri Lanka” Public Culture 5 (3): 3770393.
Week Seven: Affect & Atmosphere
Seigworth, G. & Gregg, M.“An inventory of shimmers” in Affect Theory Reader, Gregg, Melissa, Gregory J. Seigworth, and Sara Ahmed, eds, Durham: Duke University Press(2010): 1-28,
Massumi, B. “The Future Birth of the Affective Fact: The Political Ontology of Threat” Affect Theory Reader, Gregg, Melissa, Gregory J. Seigworth, and Sara Ahmed, eds, Durham: Duke University Press, (2010): 52-70.
Street, A., 2012. Affective infrastructure: Hospital landscapes of hope and failure. Space and Culture, 15(1), pp.44-56.
Brady, L.M., Bradley, J.J. and Kearney, A.J., 2016. Negotiating Yanyuwa rock art: relational and affectual experiences in the southwest Gulf of Carpentaria, northern Australia. Current Anthropology, 57(1), pp.28-52.
Week Eight: Protest & Censorship: Indonesia
Lee, D. 2016. “Introduction: Pemuda Fever” and “Style” in , Activist Archives: Youth Culture and the political past in Indonesia, Durham: Duke University Press:1-24 & 85-116
Strassler, K. 2020.“The gender of transparency” & “Naked Effects” in Demanding Images: Democracy, Mediation and the Image Event in Indonesia, Durham: Duke University Press.: 67-94, 133-168.
Week Nine: Propaganda & Popular Culture: Thailand
Chotpradit, Thanavi. "A dark spot on a royal space: The art of the People's Party and the politics of Thai (art) history." Southeast of Now: Directions in Contemporary and Modern Art in Asia 1, no. 1 (2017): 131-157
Unaldi, S. “The Politics of Space I: Siam-Ratchaprasong from Above” in Working towards the Monarchy: The Politics of Space in Downtown Bangkok, Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press (2016):144- 190.
Lim, S. “Chapter Four: Murder Reenacted” in Siam's new detectives: Visualizing crime and conspiracy in modern Thailand. University of Hawai'i Press, 2016.
Veal, Clare. "The charismatic index: Photographic representations of power and status in the Thai social order." The Trans-Asia Photography Review 3, no. 2 (Spring 2013) Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.7977573.0003.207
Week Ten: Indigenous Visions
Ahtone, H 2019. Considering Indigenous Aesthetics: a non-Western paradigm. American Indian Cultural Center and Museum Available Online at https://cdn.ymaws.com/aesthetics-online.org/resource/resmgr/articles/heatherahtone.pdf : 1-3
Raheja, M. H. (2011). “Visual Sovereignty, Indigenous Revisions of Ethnography, and Atanarjuat (The Fast Runner)” in Reservation realism: Redfacing, visual sovereignty, and representations of Native Americans in film. U of Nebraska Press. P. 190-220
Nzegwu, N., 2019. African Art in Deep Time: De‐race‐ing Aesthetics and De‐racializing Visual Art: Nzegwu African Art in Deep Time. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 77(4), pp.367-378.
Meyer, B. “Film as Revelation” in Sensational Movies: Video, Vision and Christianity in Ghana. Berkeley: University of California Press, (2015): 153- 191
Week Eleven: Indigenous Art as Commodity
Mithlo, N. “No Word for Art in Our Language?: Old Questions, New Paradigms,” Wicazo Sa Review, 27, No. 1,(Spring 2012):111-126.
Morphy. H, “A Journey to Recognition: The “Discovery” of Aboriginal Art” in Aboriginal Art, London, England: Phaidon Press (1998): 13–64.
Geismar, H. “Alternative Market Values? Interventions into Auctions in Aotearoa/New Zealand,” The Contemporary Pacific Vol. 20, No. 2 (2008): 291–327
Dragojlovic, A, “Mis-placed Boomerangs: Artistic Creativity Supply Chain Capitalism, and the Production of Ethnic Arts in Bali”, The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 13 no. 3 (2019): 245-261,
Week Twelve: New Media
Abidin, Crystal. "“Aren’t these just young, rich women doing vain things online?”: Influencer selfies as subversive frivolity." Social media+ society 2, no. 2 (2016): 2056305116641342.
Gusterson, H. Drone warfare in Waziristan and the new military humanism. Current Anthropology, 60 no. 19 (2019), 77-86.
Simpson, A. “Tell me why, why, why”: A Critical Commentary on the Visuality of Settler Expectation. Visual Anthropology Review, 34 no. 1 (2018): 60-66.
Online Support
Workload
Linkages to Other Papers
Prerequisite(s)
Anthropology undergraduate degree or equivalent.