ANTHY522-21B (NET)

Visual Power: Images, Aesthetics & Politics

30 Points

Edit Header Content
Division of Arts Law Psychology & Social Sciences
School of Social Sciences
Anthropology

Staff

Edit Staff Content

Convenor(s)

Lecturer(s)

Administrator(s)

Placement/WIL Coordinator(s)

Tutor(s)

Student Representative(s)

Lab Technician(s)

Librarian(s)

: melanie.chivers@waikato.ac.nz

You can contact staff by:

  • Calling +64 7 838 4466 select option 1, then enter the extension.
  • Extensions starting with 4, 5, 9 or 3 can also be direct dialled:
    • For extensions starting with 4: dial +64 7 838 extension.
    • For extensions starting with 5: dial +64 7 858 extension.
    • For extensions starting with 9: dial +64 7 837 extension.
    • For extensions starting with 3: dial +64 7 2620 + the last 3 digits of the extension e.g. 3123 = +64 7 262 0123.
Edit Staff Content

Paper Description

Edit Paper Description Content

From viral popular images to debates over aesthetics, the visual realm is a crucial component of social life, and hence, to the discipline of anthropology. This paper introduces students to foundational theoretical texts and contemporary debates in social and political theory and visual anthropology. To equip students to analyse visual phenomena in terms of theoretical importance, this course will also give students a foundation in anthropological debates regarding the uniqueness of the visual medium in the communication of emotion, affect and power, intersections between propaganda and popular culture, indigenous peoples ownership of their visual traditions and the relationship between meaning and materiality. This course aims to provide students with the analytical concepts with which to interpret the visual realm in a range of cultural and geographic contexts.

Edit Paper Description Content

Paper Structure

Edit Paper Structure Content
This paper is taught online in 2021. There will be a weekly two hour seminar on Zoom which students will need to attend. This will be on Thursday, or at another time as negotiated between students and the instructor in the first week of semester.
Edit Paper Structure Content

Learning Outcomes

Edit Learning Outcomes Content

Students who successfully complete the paper should be able to:

  • Understand and articulate what is distinctive about the visual as a realm of social life.
    Linked to the following assessments:
  • Discuss the relationship between images, markets and politics with theoretical nuance informed by social theory, visual studies and anthropological scholarship.
    Linked to the following assessments:
  • Analyse image events, popular images and other culturally important media with relation to technology, materiality and consumer publics
    Linked to the following assessments:
  • Appreciate a diversity of cultural engagements with images and visual media
    Linked to the following assessments:
  • Be familiar with contemporary anthropological debates regarding indigenous artwork.
    Linked to the following assessments:
Edit Learning Outcomes Content
Edit Learning Outcomes Content

Assessment

Edit Assessments Content

There are four main assessment components; Reading Responses, Short Paper or Photo/Video Essay, Class Participation & Final Project.

Reading Responses: Each student may choose which weeks they wish to submit a reading response. Eight reading responses must be submitted in total. These responses are due at 8pm on the Wednesday evening of that same week that those readings are discussed in class.

Edit Additional Assessment Information Content

Assessment Components

Edit Assessments Content

The internal assessment/exam ratio (as stated in the University Calendar) is 100:0. There is no final exam. The final exam makes up 0% of the overall mark.

The internal assessment/exam ratio (as stated in the University Calendar) is 100:0 or 0:0, whichever is more favourable for the student. The final exam makes up either 0% or 0% of the overall mark.

Component DescriptionDue Date TimePercentage of overall markSubmission MethodCompulsory
1. Reading Responses
Sum of All
25
  • Online: Submit through Moodle
2. Reading Response One
-
3. Reading Response Two
-
4. Reading Response Three
-
5. Reading Response Four
-
6. Reading Response Five
-
7. Reading Response Six
-
8. Reading Response Eight
-
9. In class participation
15
10. Short Paper/Photo Essay/Video
7 Aug 2021
1:59 AM
20
  • Online: Upload to Moodle Forum
11. Final Project Proposal
24 Aug 2021
1:59 AM
10
  • Online: Submit through Moodle
12. Final Project
16 Oct 2021
1:59 AM
30
  • Online: Submit through Moodle
Assessment Total:     100    
Failing to complete a compulsory assessment component of a paper will result in an IC grade
Edit Assessments Content

Required and Recommended Readings

Edit Required Readings Content

Required Readings

Edit Required Readings Content

Week One: Introduction

It is recommended that you read Spyer & Steadly (2013) or Rose (2001) but these are not required until week two.

Week Two: Theories of Visual Power: One.

Gillian Rose, Researching Visual Materials: toward a critical visual methodology” Visual Methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials, California: Sage, 2001, 5-32.

Spyer, P & Steadly, M. “Introduction” in Images that Move, Sante Fe: SarPress, 2013, 3-39.

Mitchell, William J. Thomas. "What Do Pictures" Really" Want?." October 77 (1996): 71-82.

Taylor, Lucien. "Iconophobia." Transition 69 (1996): 64-88.

Week Three: Theories of Visual Power: Two

Adorno, M and Horkeimer, T “The culture industry” in Dialectic of Enlightenment, published in “Media and Culture Studies”, Douglas M. Kellner, Meenakshi Gigi Durham (eds), NJ, Wiley:1944 [2006]: 41- 72.

Benjamin, W.“The Work of Art in the Age of its Technological Reproducibility”, in The work of art in the age of its technological reproducibitily and other writings on media Jennings, Doherty & Levin (eds), The Belknap Press of Harvard Univeristy Press: Cambridge, MA.(2008 [1935]): 19-41.

Jodi Dean “Celebrity’s Drive” in Dean, Jodi. Publicity's secret: How technoculture capitalizes on democracy. Cornell: Cornell University Press (2002):114-150

Barthes, R. Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. Translated by Richard Howard. London: Vintage, (1981):23-60

Week Four: Materiality of the Visual

Larkin, Brian. “Degraded Images” in Signal and noise: Infrastructure and Urban Culture in Nigeria. Durham: Duke University Press, (2008): 289-314.

Flood, Finbarr Barry. "Between cult and culture: Bamiyan, Islamic iconoclasm, and the museum." The Art Bulletin 84, no. 4 (2002): 641-659.

Bruno, Giuliana. Surface: Matters of aesthetics, materiality, and media. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014 [Excerpts]

Klima, Alan. “The Charnel Ground” in The funeral casino. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009: 184-230.

Week Five: Race and its Depictions

Roth, L. “Looking at Shirley, the Ultimate Norm: Colour Balance, Image Technologies, and Cognitive Equity”. Canadian Journal of Communication, 34 no 1 (2009): 111-136.

Poole, D. “Equivalent Images” in Vision, Race & its Modernity, p. 107-141

Croft, B. “Laying Ghosts to Rest” in Hight, Eleanor M., and Gary D. Sampson, eds. Colonialist photography: imag (in) ing race and place. Vol. 9. London: Routledge, (2013): 20-29.

Fleetwood, N. 2020. “Captured by the frame: photographic studies of prisoners“ in Marking Time: Art in the Age of Mass Incarceration, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press: 87-117

Week Six: Advertising & Nationalism

Dávila, Arlene. “Images: Producing Culture for the Market” in Latino Spin: Public Image and the Whitewashing of Race. New York: NYU Press (2008): 91-119; 29 pages

Fattal, A. “Operation Christmas” in Guerrilla Marketing: Counterinsurgency and Capitalism in Colombia: Chicago: University of Chicago Press (2018): 80-110

Mazarrella, W.“Citizens Have Sex, Consumers Make Love: KamaSutra I” in Shovelling Smoke: Advertising & Globalization in Contemporary India. Durham: Duke University Press (2003): 59-98

Kemper, S.1993. “The nation consumed: buying and believing in Sri Lanka” Public Culture 5 (3): 3770393.

Week Seven: Affect & Atmosphere

Seigworth, G. & Gregg, M.“An inventory of shimmers” in Affect Theory Reader, Gregg, Melissa, Gregory J. Seigworth, and Sara Ahmed, eds, Durham: Duke University Press(2010): 1-28,

Massumi, B. “The Future Birth of the Affective Fact: The Political Ontology of Threat” Affect Theory Reader, Gregg, Melissa, Gregory J. Seigworth, and Sara Ahmed, eds, Durham: Duke University Press, (2010): 52-70.

Street, A., 2012. Affective infrastructure: Hospital landscapes of hope and failure. Space and Culture, 15(1), pp.44-56.

Brady, L.M., Bradley, J.J. and Kearney, A.J., 2016. Negotiating Yanyuwa rock art: relational and affectual experiences in the southwest Gulf of Carpentaria, northern Australia. Current Anthropology, 57(1), pp.28-52.

Week Eight: Protest & Censorship: Indonesia

Lee, D. 2016. “Introduction: Pemuda Fever” and “Style” in , Activist Archives: Youth Culture and the political past in Indonesia, Durham: Duke University Press:1-24 & 85-116

Strassler, K. 2020.“The gender of transparency” & “Naked Effects” in Demanding Images: Democracy, Mediation and the Image Event in Indonesia, Durham: Duke University Press.: 67-94, 133-168.

Week Nine: Propaganda & Popular Culture: Thailand

Chotpradit, Thanavi. "A dark spot on a royal space: The art of the People's Party and the politics of Thai (art) history." Southeast of Now: Directions in Contemporary and Modern Art in Asia 1, no. 1 (2017): 131-157

Unaldi, S. The Politics of Space I: Siam-Ratchaprasong from Above” in Working towards the Monarchy: The Politics of Space in Downtown Bangkok, Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press (2016):144- 190.

Lim, S. “Chapter Four: Murder Reenacted” in Siam's new detectives: Visualizing crime and conspiracy in modern Thailand. University of Hawai'i Press, 2016.

Veal, Clare. "The charismatic index: Photographic representations of power and status in the Thai social order." The Trans-Asia Photography Review 3, no. 2 (Spring 2013) Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.7977573.0003.207

Week Ten: Indigenous Visions

Ahtone, H 2019. Considering Indigenous Aesthetics: a non-Western paradigm. American Indian Cultural Center and Museum Available Online at https://cdn.ymaws.com/aesthetics-online.org/resource/resmgr/articles/heatherahtone.pdf : 1-3

Raheja, M. H. (2011). “Visual Sovereignty, Indigenous Revisions of Ethnography, and Atanarjuat (The Fast Runner)” in Reservation realism: Redfacing, visual sovereignty, and representations of Native Americans in film. U of Nebraska Press. P. 190-220

Nzegwu, N., 2019. African Art in Deep Time: De‐race‐ing Aesthetics and De‐racializing Visual Art: Nzegwu African Art in Deep Time. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 77(4), pp.367-378.

Meyer, B. “Film as Revelation” in Sensational Movies: Video, Vision and Christianity in Ghana. Berkeley: University of California Press, (2015): 153- 191

Week Eleven: Indigenous Art as Commodity

Mithlo, N. “No Word for Art in Our Language?: Old Questions, New Paradigms,” Wicazo Sa Review, 27, No. 1,(Spring 2012):111-126.

Morphy. H, “A Journey to Recognition: The “Discovery” of Aboriginal Art” in Aboriginal Art, London, England: Phaidon Press (1998): 13–64.

Geismar, H. “Alternative Market Values? Interventions into Auctions in Aotearoa/New Zealand,” The Contemporary Pacific Vol. 20, No. 2 (2008): 291–327

Dragojlovic, A, “Mis-placed Boomerangs: Artistic Creativity Supply Chain Capitalism, and the Production of Ethnic Arts in Bali”, The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 13 no. 3 (2019): 245-261,

Week Twelve: New Media

Abidin, Crystal. "“Aren’t these just young, rich women doing vain things online?”: Influencer selfies as subversive frivolity." Social media+ society 2, no. 2 (2016): 2056305116641342.

Gusterson, H. Drone warfare in Waziristan and the new military humanism. Current Anthropology, 60 no. 19 (2019), 77-86.

Simpson, A. “Tell me why, why, why”: A Critical Commentary on the Visuality of Settler Expectation. Visual Anthropology Review, 34 no. 1 (2018): 60-66.

Edit Required Readings Content

Online Support

Edit Online Support Content
This paper is supported by moodle. You will find additional readings, assignment guidelines and other material of relevance.
Edit Online Support Content

Workload

Edit Workload Content
This is a 30pt graudate paper, which is the equivalent to 300 hours of study during the semester.
Edit Workload Content

Linkages to Other Papers

Edit Linkages Content

Prerequisite(s)

Anthropology undergraduate degree or equivalent.

Corequisite(s)

Equivalent(s)

Restriction(s)

Edit Linkages Content